雑談用掲示板
[リストに戻る] [ホームに戻る] [新規投稿] [スレッド表示] [トピック表示] [留意事項] [ワード検索] [管理用]
タイトルGenerally, if peop
投稿日: 2025/07/03(Thu) 15:06
投稿者HarveyFus  <jeffreytutt1967@biliterfml.com>
参照先https://tripscan.biz

Generally, if people were more informed about the average
<a href=https://tripscan.biz>亳仗 从舒仆</a>
(environmental) cost of generating a response, people would maybe start thinking, Is it really necessary to turn myself into an action figure just because Im bored? Or do I have to tell ChatGPT jokes because I have nothing to do? Dauner said.

Additionally, as more companies push to add generative AI tools to their systems, people may not have much choice how or when they use the technology, Luccioni said.

We dont need generative AI in web search. Nobody asked for AI chatbots in (messaging apps) or on social media, Luccioni said. This race to stuff them into every single existing technology is truly infuriating, since it comes with real consequences to our planet.
https://tripscan.biz
tripskan
With less available information about AIs resource usage, consumers have less choice, Ren said, adding that regulatory pressures for more transparency are unlikely to the United States anytime soon. Instead, the best hope for more energy-efficient AI may lie in the cost efficacy of using less energy.

Overall, Im still positive about (the future). There are many software engineers working hard to improve resource efficiency, Ren said. Other industries consume a lot of energy too, but its not a reason to suggest AIs environmental impact is not a problem. We should definitely pay attention.

Sign up for CNNs Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis and reduce your eco-anxiety.

- 関連ツリー

Generally, if peop - HarveyFus 2025/07/03(Thu) 15:06 No.673652


- 返信フォーム

お名前
Eメール
タイトル
メッセージ
参照先
暗証キー (英数字で8文字以内)
投稿キー (投稿時 投稿キー を入力してください)
文字色